4.7 Article

Coordination of integrated natural gas and electrical systems in day-ahead scheduling considering a novel flexible energy-use mechanism

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 117-126

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.109

关键词

Flexible energy-use mechanism; Electrolyzer; Hydrogen application; Power-to-gas; Surplus electricity

资金

  1. Electric Power Research Institute of Yunan Power Grid Company, P.R. China [YNKJXM20180254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel flexible energy-use mechanism is proposed based on the energy coordination among electrolyzers, steam methane reforming (SMR) plants and gas-fired units in the day-ahead scheduling of the integrated gas-electrical system. The power-to-gas (P2G) energy conversion method provides an effective solution to the energy dilemma in China. Nevertheless, this method requires a high-value chain for application due to its high investment cost at present. Producing, and then selling, hydrogen via electrolyzers is more valuable than storing it for a later generation. The two hydrogen production methods of SMR and electrolysis can be combined with the operation optimization of electrical and natural gas systems to form a flexible energy-use mechanism. A model of the flexible energy-use mechanism is established. The model can be integrated into interdependent natural gas and electricity systems, aiming to alleviate the shortage of natural gas, improve energy efficiency and lower carbon emissions. To demonstrate the economic feasibility and carbon dioxide emissions reduction of the proposed mechanism, a bus-6 power system integrated with a node-6 natural gas system and an IEEE 30-bus system with a modified Belgian 20-node gas system are examined. It is concluded that the proposed flexible energy-use mechanism in the power and natural gas systems has higher economic value and lower carbon emissions than the power-to-hydrogen-to-methane-to-pipeline path.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据