4.7 Article

Hydrogen production through steam reforming of toluene over Ce, Zr or Fe promoted Ni-Mg-Al hydrotalcite-derived catalysts at low temperature

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 677-687

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.047

关键词

Catalytic cracking; Hydrotalcite-derived catalysts; Toluene; Carbon deposit

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation China [21878338]
  2. Key Research and Development Project of Hunan Province [2018SK2038]
  3. Hunan Collaborative Innovation Center of Building Energy Conservation & Environmental Control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni-Mg-Al hydrotalcite-derived materials promoted with Ce, Zr or Fe were prepared by the co-precipitation method, which exhibited excellent performance in steam reforming of toluene (SRT) at low temperature. Especially, Fe-doped catalyst had higher catalytic activity and stability at 400 degrees C, which maintained almost 100% toluene conversion during the SRT reaction (3 h). Moreover, it also had higher hydrogen production and better selectivity for hydrogen production. The physico-chemical characterizations and model simulation indicate its high dispersion of active sites and accessibility of reactants to active sites: uniform dispersion of active sites (SEM, TEM and EDX), large specific surface area (151 m(2)/g), pore volume (0.84 cm(3)/g) and average pore diameter (22.1 nm), small crystallite size (34.9 nm), desirable Ni species reducibility (TPR), high basicity (TPD), low metal carbide formation (XPS), and good adsorption affinity with toluene (- 18.391 kJ mol(-1), DFT). Moreover, less carbon was deposited on the Fe-containing catalyst through measuring the amorphous carbon and CNTs by the TG-MS method, which was due to the tip-growth mechanism of CNTs. Considering lower toluene conversion temperature, higher hydrogen yield, and better resistance to carbon deposition, this study may be meaningful in development of SRT at low temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据