4.5 Review

Evaluation of New Genetic Toolkits and Their Role for Ethanol Production in Cyanobacteria

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 12, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12183515

关键词

biofuel; synthetic biology; expression system; Synechocystis sp; PCC6803

资金

  1. ERDF-European Regional Development Fund, within the INTERREG Austria-Czech Republic project Algenetics [ATCZ15]
  2. University for Continuing Education Krems
  3. University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria
  4. University of Applied Sciences BFI Vienna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the public awareness for climate change has risen, increasing scientific effort has been made to find and develop alternative resources and production processes to reduce the dependency on petrol-based fuels and chemicals of our society. Among others, the biotechnological fuel production, as for example fermenting sugar-rich crops to ethanol, is one of the main strategies. For this purpose, various classical production systems like Escherichia coli or Saccharomyces cerevisiae are used and have been optimized via genetic modifications. Despite the progress made, this strategy competes for nutritional resources and agricultural land. To overcome this problem, various attempts were made for direct photosynthetic driven ethanol synthesis with different microalgal species including cyanobacteria. However, compared to existing platforms, the development of cyanobacteria as photoautotrophic cell factories has just started, and accordingly, the ethanol yield of established production systems is still unreached. This is mainly attributed to low ethanol tolerance levels of cyanobacteria and there is still potential for optimizing the cyanobacteria towards alternative gene expression systems. Meanwhile, several improvements were made by establishing new toolboxes for synthetic biology offering new possibilities for advanced genetic modifications of cyanobacteria. Here, current achievements and innovations of those new molecular tools are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据