4.6 Article

Probing and suppressing voltage fade of Li-rich Li1.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54O2 cathode material for lithium-ion battery

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 318, 期 -, 页码 875-882

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.119

关键词

Voltage fade; Li-rich cathode material; Structure change; Cations rearrangement; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0202602]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1663225, 21671155, 21805220]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2018CFB242, 2018CFA054]
  4. Major Technology Innovation of Hubei Province [2018AAA012]
  5. Program for Changjiang Scholars Innovative Research Team in University [IRT_15R52]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The voltage fade of Li-rich layered oxide cathode material Li1.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54O2 (LNCM) heavily hinders its application in Li-ion batteries. Herein, we revisit the origin of the voltage fade of LNCM and propose a solution to suppress this effect. It is demonstrated that the voltage fade of the LNCM cathode comes from the structural change of the crystal from layer structure to spinel structure, involving all the cations rearrangement. Such rearrangement of all the cations in LNCM is due to the high degree of delithiation and oxygen release at high cutoff voltage of 4.8 V. It is also evidenced that nickel and cobalt change from low valence to high valence at the discharged state, which not only inhibits the transport of lithium ions, but also leads to the loss of high voltage platforms. In particular, the cation rearrangement of Li/Mn causes valence change from Mn4+ to Mn3+, resulting in the decrease of discharge voltage platform at the cutoff voltage of 4.8 V much higher than at 4.6 V. The lower charge cutoff voltage can be a solution to suppress the voltage fade of LNCM cathode materials and have a good stability of LNCM cathode materials without compromising the battery performance. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据