4.4 Review

Brief interventions for cannabis use in emerging adults: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map

期刊

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107565

关键词

Cannabis; Motivational; Brief intervention; Emerging adult; Adolescent; Young adult

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Doctoral Research Training Award
  2. Michael G. DeGroote Centre for Medicinal Cannabis Research
  3. Peter Boris Chair in Addictions Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This systematic review summarizes and critically appraises the existing literature on brief interventions (Bls) for cannabis use among emerging adults. Methods: Eligible Bls were operationalized as 1-2 sessions focused exclusively on cannabis use for samples with mean ages between 15 and 30. Outcomes related to cannabis use, other substance use, mental health, help-seeking, or functional status were included. Two independent reviewers screened a total of 3638 records, identifying 244 studies for full-text screening. In total, 32 BIs in 26 primary studies with 6318 participants were included. Results: Participants were typically not seeking treatment and using cannabis at least once a month. Most interventions were motivational, single sessions, and delivered in person. Few discussed concurrent psychiatric conditions. Pooling results at 1-3 months post-intervention, Bls compared to passive control slightly reduced symptoms of cannabis use disorder (SMD 0.14 [95% CI 0.26 to 0.01]) and increased the odds of abstinence (OR 1.73 [95% CI 1.13-2.66]). Other outcome results often favored BIs but were not significant. Results of studies comparing types of BIs (k = 8) or Bls to longer interventions (k = 1) are discussed narratively. Quality assessment suggested low to very low-quality evidence. Conclusions: This review indicates that BIs targeting non-treatment seeking emerging adults result in significant reductions in symptoms of cannabis use disorder and an increased likelihood of cannabis abstinence, however evidence is of low quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据