4.1 Review

Regulation of active and quiescent somatic stem cells by Notch signaling

期刊

DEVELOPMENT GROWTH & DIFFERENTIATION
卷 62, 期 1, 页码 59-66

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12626

关键词

active stem cell; Hes1; Notch signaling; oscillatory expression; quiescent stem cell

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) [JPMJCR12W2]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) [16H06480]
  3. AMED-CREST
  4. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [JP18gm1110002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Somatic stem/progenitor cells actively proliferate and give rise to different types of mature cells (active state) in embryonic tissues while they are mostly dormant (quiescent state) in many adult tissues. Notch signaling is known to regulate both active and quiescent states of somatic stem cells, but how it regulates these different states is unknown. Recent studies revealed that the Notch effector Hes1 is expressed differently during the active and quiescent states during neurogenesis and myogenesis: high in the quiescent state and oscillatory in the active state. When the Hes1 expression level is high, both Ascl1 and MyoD expression are continuously suppressed. By contrast, when Hes1 expression oscillates, it periodically represses expression of the neurogenic factor Ascl1 and the myogenic factor MyoD, thereby driving Ascl1 and MyoD oscillations. High levels of Hes1 and the resultant Ascl1 suppression promote the quiescent state of neural stem cells, while Hes1 oscillation-dependent Ascl1 oscillations regulate their active state. Similarly, in satellite cells of muscles, known adult muscle stem cells, high levels of Hes1 and the resultant MyoD suppression seem to promote their quiescent state, while Hes1 oscillation-dependent MyoD oscillations activate their proliferation and differentiation. Therefore, the expression dynamics of Hes1 is a key regulatory mechanism of generating and maintaining active/quiescent stem cell states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据