4.7 Article

MeSiCl3 functionalized polyamide thin film nanocomposite for low pressure RO membrane desalination

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 463, 期 -, 页码 13-22

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.04.006

关键词

Thin film nanocomposite membrane; Methyltrichlorosilane; Interfacial polymerization; In situ; PA; Reverse osmosis

资金

  1. National Major Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0401508]
  2. Open Research Fund Program of Collaborative Innovation Centre of Membrane Separation and Water Treatment of Zhejiang Province [2016ZD02, 2016YB08]
  3. Zhejiang Kaichuang Environmental Technology Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes with higher permeability are related to hydrophilic nanocomposites. Nevertheless, in nature, water permeates faster in hydrophobic pores (e.g. aquaporin) because of less affinity between water and wall of the pore. Here we show hydrophobic methyltrichlorosilane (MeSiCl3, MTS) functionalized polyamide TFN can be used to construct highly efficient desalination membranes. The TFN membranes were synthesized through the interfacial polymerization of aqueous amine and organic MTS/acyl chloride solutions. Both the water flux and water/salt selectivity increased. The water flux increased by more than a factor of 1.96, from 2.4 to 4.7 LMH/bar, as the fraction of MTS increased from 0 to 0.1 mM in the organic solution. Importantly, the water/salt selectivity ratio increased from 11.4 to 18.5 bar(-1). Thus, MeSiCl3 imparted narrow water channels to the polyamide matrix with higher flow rate and better selectivity. The enhanced compatibility and interactions between MTS and the polyamide polymers were attributed to their covalent (Si-N) and hydrogen (O center dot center dot center dot H) bonds. MTS modified TFN membranes also show high water flux and recovery ratio in the bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution. This facile in situ modification provides a new insight into the high performance of hydrophobic TFN membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据