4.4 Article

Ionic Strength Is a Barrier to the Habitability of Mars

期刊

ASTROBIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 427-442

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ast.2015.1432

关键词

Habitability; Mars; Salts; Water activity; Life in extreme environments

资金

  1. Royal Society of Edinburgh
  2. UK Space Agency as part of the Aurora Science program
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/M001261/1]
  4. STFC [ST/M001261/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M001261/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. UK Space Agency [ST/J005371/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermodynamic availability of water (water activity) strictly limits microbial propagation on Earth, particularly in hypersaline environments. A considerable body of evidence indicates the existence of hypersaline surface waters throughout the history of Mars; therefore it is assumed that, as on Earth, water activity is a major limiting factor for martian habitability. However, the differing geological histories of Earth and Mars have driven variations in their respective aqueous geochemistry, with as-yet-unknown implications for habitability. Using a microbial community enrichment approach, we investigated microbial habitability for a suite of simulated martian brines. While the habitability of some martian brines was consistent with predictions made from water activity, others were uninhabitable even when the water activity was biologically permissive. We demonstrate experimentally that high ionic strength, driven to extremes on Mars by the ubiquitous occurrence of multivalent ions, renders these environments uninhabitable despite the presence of biologically available water. These findings show how the respective geological histories of Earth and Mars, which have produced differences in the planets' dominant water chemistries, have resulted in different physicochemical extremes which define the boundary space for microbial habitability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据