4.7 Article

Identification Schemes for Metal-Organic Frameworks To Enable Rapid Search and Cheminformatics Analysis

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 6682-6697

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01050

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences through the Nano porous Materials Genome Center [DEFG02-12ER16362, DE-FG02-17ER16362]
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE1324585]
  3. Department of Defense (DOD), Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship [32 CFR 168a]
  4. Ryan Fellowships via the International Institute for Nanotechnology at Northwestern University
  5. Office of the Provost
  6. Office for Research
  7. Northwestern University Information Technology
  8. [FA9550-11-C-0028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modular nature of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) leads to a very large number of possible structures. High-throughput computational screening has led to a rapid increase in property data that has enabled several potential applications for MOFs, including gas storage, separations, catalysis, and other fields. Despite their rich chemistry, MOFs are typically named using an ad hoc approach, which can impede their searchability and the discovery of broad insights. In this article, we develop two systematic MOF identifiers, coined MOFid and MOFkey, and algorithms for deconstructing MOFs into their building blocks and underlying topological network. We review existing cheminformatics formats for small molecules and address the challenges of adapting them to periodic crystal structures. Our algorithms are distributed as open-source soft-ware, and we apply them here to extract insights from several MOF databases. Through the process of designing MOFid and MOFkey, we provide a perspective on opportunities for the community to facilitate data reuse, improve searchability, and rapidly apply cheminformatics analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据