4.8 Review

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their composites as electrodes for lithium battery applications: Novel means for alternative energy storage

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 48-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.05.006

关键词

MOFs; Li-ion; Batteries; Separator; Cyclic stability

资金

  1. R&D Center for Green Patrol Technologies through the R&D for Global Top Environmental Technologies - Ministry of Environment [2018001850001]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2016R1E1A1A01940995]
  3. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ014297]
  4. UGC
  5. CSIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as a novel class of advanced functional materials due to their many well-known merits (e.g., ultrahigh porosity, favorable pore size distribution, easy functionalization, and structural tailorability). However, their use in various electronics applications is restricted due to their insulating nature. Therefore, a need arises to intercalate MOFs with various functional/conductive materials for synergistic applications like electrode materials (e.g., diverse Li-ion batteries: LIBs). In this review, the recent developments on pristine MOFs and their derived nanostructures (e.g., nanoporous carbons and metal oxides) for electrode applications are discussed in detail. We focused on the recent applications of various MOF-based composites in anodic/cathodic materials (e.g., LIBs, lithium-sulfur batteries (Li-S), lithium-air batteries (Li-O-2), and lithium hybrid electrochemical capacitors (Li-HEC)) along with details associated with their electrochemical performance. This review is expected to help materials scientists to construct a roadmap for the selection of the best possible electrode materials for LIBs. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据