4.7 Article

Chloride permeability and the caused steel corrosion in the concrete with carbonated recycled aggregate

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 506-518

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.136

关键词

Recycled concrete; Carbonated recycled aggregate; Chloride permeability; Steel corrosion

资金

  1. Shaoxing Science and Technology Planning Project [51708419, 51308340]
  2. [2018C30007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbonation treatment was recently developed to enhance the properties of recycle concrete aggregate and prepared concrete, but the durability of concrete with carbonated recycled aggregate have received little consideration in the previous studies. This study investigates the chloride permeability and the resulting steel corrosion of concrete with carbonated recycled fine and coarse aggregates, and the effects of recycled aggregate quality on chloride permeability are presented. The carbonization treatment was first applied to recycled aggregate to prepare carbonated recycled aggregate; then, the chloride permeability and steel corrosion experiments were conducted on concrete with carbonated recycled aggregate. The results exhibit that carbonation treatment improves the physical performance of recycled aggregate, which results in an increase in the compressive strength of preparing recycled concrete. Concrete with carbonated recycled aggregate has a lower chloride permeability than that with non-carbonated recycled aggregate, and the improvement in the chloride permeability resistance is more obvious for concrete with carbonated recycled fine and coarse aggregates. In particular, the improvement of chloride permeability resistance becomes more distinct with the reduction of recycled aggregate quality. The addition of carbonated recycled aggregate reduces the steel corrosion risk of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete, and the chloride permeability and steel corrosion risk follow a linear trend. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据