4.7 Article

Topology optimization for auxetic metamaterials based on isogeometric analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.021

关键词

Auxetic metamaterials; Topology optimization; Isogeometric analysis; Homogenization

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC)-Discovery Projects [160102491]
  2. China Equipment Pre-research Program [41423010102]
  3. National Basic Scientific Research Program of China [JCKY2016110C012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an effective and efficient topology optimization method, termed as Isogeometric Topology Optimization (ITO), is proposed for systematic design of both 2D and 3D auxetic metamaterials based on isogeometric analysis (IGA). Firstly, a density distribution function (DDF) with the desired smoothness and continuity, to represent the topological changes of structures, is constructed using the Shepard function and non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS) basis functions. Secondly, an energy-based homogenization method (EBHM) to evaluate material effective properties is numerically implemented by IGA, with the imposing of the periodic boundary formulation on material microstructure. Thirdly, a topology optimization formulation for 2D and 3D auxetic metamaterials is developed based on the DDF, where the objective function is defined as a combination of the homogenized elastic tensor and the IGA is applied to solve the structural responses. A relaxed optimality criteria (OC) method is used to update the design variables, due to the non-monotonic property of the problem. Finally, several numerical examples are used to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method. A series of auxetic microstructures with different deformation mechanisms (e.g. the re-entrant and chiral) can be obtained. The auxetic behavior of material microstructures are numerically validated using ANSYS, and the optimized designs are prototyped using the Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) technique. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据