4.7 Article

Fabrication on the annealed Ti3C2Tx MXene/Epoxy nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding application

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 111-118

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.050

关键词

Ti3C2Tx MXene; Thermal reduction; Epoxy electromagnetic shielding nanocomposites

资金

  1. China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation [2019-HT-XG, 2018-HT-XG]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan for Distinguished Young Scholars in Shaanxi Province of China [S2019-JC-11]
  3. Foundation of Aeronautics Science Fund [2017ZF53071]
  4. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2018JM5001]
  5. School-enterprise Collaborative Innovation Fund for Graduate Students of Northwestern Polytechnical University [XQ201913]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few-layered Ti3C2Tx MXene was fabricated by ionic intercalation and sonication-assisted method, followed by thermal reduction at medium-low temperature. Then annealed Ti3C2Tx/epoxy electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding nanocomposites were obtained by solution casting method. XRD, SEM, AFM and TEM indicated the successful preparation of few-layered Ti3C2Tx. FTIR, XPS and XRD showed that thermal reduction removed partial polar groups on the surface of Ti3C2Tx with no by-product. For a fixed Ti3C2Tx loading, compared with Ti3C2Tx/epoxy EMI shielding nanocomposites, the annealed Ti3C2Tx/epoxy EMI shielding nanocomposites exhibited relatively higher electrical conductivity and excellent EMI shielding effectiveness (SE). When the mass fraction of annealed Ti3C2Tx was 15 wt%, the annealed Ti3C2Tx/epoxy EMI shielding nanocomposites presented the optimal electrical conductivity of 105 S/m and EMI SE of 41 dB, 176% and 37% higher than that of 15 wt% Ti3C2Tx/epoxy EMI shielding nanocomposites. Furthermore, the 5 wt% annealed Ti3C2Tx/epoxy EMI shielding nanocomposites exhibited the optimal Young's modulus of 4.32 GPa and hardness of 0.29 GPa, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据