4.7 Article

Fabrication of super-tough ternary blends by melt compounding of poly(lactic acid) with poly(butylene succinate) and ethylene-methyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 743-749

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.098

关键词

poly(lactic acid); poly(butylene succinate); Ethylene-methyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate; Melt compounding; Super tough; In situ reaction

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province, P. R. China [2015B090904004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51435005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, we describe the fabrication of novel super-tough ternary blends by simple melt compounding of poly (lactic acid) (PLA) with poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and ethylene-methyl acrylate-glycidyl methacrylate (EGMA). The occurrence of reactions between the above three constituents was evidenced by mixing torque and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses and resulted in improved interfacial adhesion. Moreover, surface energy analysis indicated that EGMA was selectively localized at the PLA-PBS interface, and the cryofracture morphologies of as-prepared samples indicated that the inclusion of EGMA improved the compatibility between PLA and PBS phases. Compared to virgin PLA, the ternary blend containing 10 wt% PBS and 12 wt% EGMA exhibited a 32 times higher impact strength (98 kJ/m(2)), an only 44% loss of tensile strength (38 MPa), and superior stretchability (elongation at break = 460%). The observed property improvements were ascribed to in situ reactions between PLA, PBS, and EGMA and to the formation of elastic graft copolymers at phase boundaries. Ultimately, comparison of as-prepared samples with previously reported blends demonstrated that the former exhibited superior toughness and comparable stiffness, revealing that our work opens new avenues to expand the applications of PLA-based biodegradable products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据