4.7 Article

High specific strength hybrid polypropylene composites using carbon fibre and hollow glass microspheres: Development, characterization and comparison with empirical models

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.086

关键词

Hort carbon fibre; Hollow glass microsphere; Hybrid polypropylene composite; Micromechanical models

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synergistic effect of hollow glass microspheres (HGM) addition on various physical and mechanical properties of short carbon fibre (SCF) reinforced polypropylene (PP) hybrid composites were investigated. Hybrid composite samples were prepared by melt mixing PP, maleic anhydride-grafted-PP (MA-g-PP), SCF and surface-treated HGM. Effect of varying concentration of HGM (0-40 wt%) and SCF (0, 5, 8 wt%) on various physical and mechanical properties was analyzed. HGM showed an impressive positive impact in reducing the overall density of composites with its increasing concentration. Among all the different composite formulations, hybrid composite incorporated with 10 and 8 wt% HGM and SCF showed the highest tensile and flexural strength (up by similar to 110 and similar to 112% over pure PP). Interestingly, the specific tensile strength with only 8 wt% SCF was observed to be significantly high (similar to 100 MPa/g/cm(3)) and similar to commercial PP composites containing much higher (40 wt %) fibre contents. Empirical estimates of tensile modulus evaluated using several available micromechanical models, indicated that a combination of Ishai and Cohen (upper bound) and Halpin-Tsai models which assume a perfect particle- and fibre-matrix interfacial adhesion, are in excellent agreement with results of this investigation. Morphological analysis of cryo-fractured surfaces revealed good dispersion and distribution of both HGM and SCF with very negligible broken HGM fillers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据