4.5 Article

Effects of high-fat diet on growth performance, lipid accumulation and lipid metabolism-related MicroRNA/gene expression in the liver of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2019.04.006

关键词

Grass carp; Lipid metabolism; Liver; High-fat diet; MicroRNA; MRNA

资金

  1. Hunan Province Science and Technology Major Project [2017NK1030]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi [20152ACB21010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An 8 week experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary fat on growth and on the accumulation of lipids and the expression of lipid metabolism-related microRNAs (miRNAs) and genes in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Two diets (normal fat diet (NFD), 60 g/kg lipid content; high fat diet (HFD), 160 g/kg lipid content) were fed to triplicate groups of 35 fish [initial weight of (40.0 +/- 0.5) g]. The results showed that increased dietary fat did not lead to significant differences in the feed conversion rate (FCR) and specific growth rate (SGR) (P > .05), but the HFD significantly increased the hepatosomatic index (HSI) (P < .05). The serum high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) level was significantly increased in the HFD group (P < .05). Oil Red 0 staining showed that both the size and amounts of lipid droplets in the liver of fish fed a diet with 2 g/kg lipid content increased significantly. In the liver of fish fed with 160 g/kg dietary fat, the expression of mir-33a, mir-30, mir-122 and mir-16 significantly decreased (P < .05). In contrast, the expression of sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1 (SREBP1), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma), liver X receptor alpha (LXR alpha) and ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) significantly increased (P < .05). In conclusion, 2 g/kg dietary fat did not influence growth but altered the expression of miRNAs and genes related to lipid metabolism in the liver of grass carp, which caused severe lipid deposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据