4.4 Article

DFT Study on the C-NO Coupling Reaction with Different Active Sites

期刊

COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 193, 期 4, 页码 541-560

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2019.1663415

关键词

Char; NO; active site; thermodynamic parameters; density functional theory

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0601805]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776001, 51376008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study used density functional theory to analyze the heterogeneous interaction between NO and char, revealing the important role of active sites in NO adsorption and reduction. Thermodynamic parameters demonstrated the impact of different active sites on the reaction mechanism, confirming the significance of active sites in the process of NO reduction.
The heterogeneous interaction between NO and char with two to four active sites (R1-R3) has been studied using density functional theory (DFT). The thermodynamic parameters which can be used as an important foundation for distinguishing the differences in reaction mechanism are calculated. The calculations show that active sites play an important role in NO adsorption. R3 provides more sites for NO adsorption, which is more favorable for NO chemisorption. The energy barrier for NO reduction to N2O or N-2 on R1, R2, and R3 surface is 122.25, 81.5, and 38.4 kJ/mol, respectively, signifying that the more active sites on char surface are more conducive to NO reduction. On the other hand, the difference in energy barrier values of N-2 desorption on R2 and R3 surface reveal that oxygen-containing groups on different char surface have different effects on N-2 desorption. Thermodynamic parameters of char-NO reaction at different active sites are further analyzed, and the strong dependence of the reaction process on the active sites is clarified through thermodynamics. The calculation results deepen the mechanism of NO reduction and lay a foundation for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据