4.5 Article

In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 1200-1208

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13533

关键词

CBCT; dental implant; dental radiography; diagnostic accuracy; low-dose protocol; peri-implantitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To investigate the in vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (LD-CBCT) for the detection, classification, and measurement of peri-implant bone lesions. Material and methods Titanium dental implants with all-ceramic single crowns (n = 24) were inserted into bovine bone. At twelve implants, four types of peri-implant bone lesions were created. Radiographic imaging was performed using three techniques: LD-CBCT, high-definition CBCT (HD-CBCT), and intraoral radiography (IR). The datasets were presented twice to four observers in a random order. Diagnostic accuracy was measured by calculating sensitivity and specificity, and analyzed using the McNemar's test at a significance level of 0.05. Absolute agreement between the defect sizes was assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results For all three techniques, diagnostic accuracy and reliability for the detection of defects were almost perfect. The following order was found for classification of the different defect types (sensitivity/specificity): HD-CBCT (0.96/0.99) > LD-CBCT (0.93/0.98) > IR (0.71/0.95). No significant difference was found between the two CBCT techniques. Their performance was superior to that of IR. With regard to absolute agreement of defect size, LD-CBCT agreement with HD-CBCT (ICC, 95% confidence interval) was slight for defect depth (0.342, 0.181-0.625) and substantial for defect width (0.911, 0.775-0.963). Conclusion Intraoral radiography is useful for detecting peri-implant bone lesions. LD-CBCT provides additional information regarding the geometry of defects. The even higher diagnostic accuracy of the HD-CBCT protocol tested needs to be carefully weighed against its radiation dose, which is 14 times higher than that of LD-CBCT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据