4.7 Article

First-in-Human Phase I Clinical Trial of Pharmacologic Ascorbate Combined with Radiation and Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 22, 页码 6590-6597

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0594

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. University of Iowa Department of Radiation Oncology
  2. Burke Family Foundation
  3. Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center
  4. [P01CA217797]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Standard treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) includes surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and temozolomide (TMZ), yielding a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 14 months. Preclinical models suggest that pharmacologic ascorbate (P-AscH(-)) enhances RT/TMZ antitumor effect in GBM. We evaluated the safety of adding P-AscH(-) to standard RT/TMZ therapy. Patients and Methods: This first-in-human trial was divided into an RT phase (concurrent RT/TMZ/P-AscH(-)) and an adjuvant (ADJ) phase (post RT/TMZ/P-AscH(-) phase). Eight P-AscH(-) dose cohorts were evaluated in the RT phase until targeted plasma ascorbate levels were achieved (>= 20 mmol/L). In the ADJ phase, P-AscH(-) doses were escalated in each subject at each cycle until plasma concentrations were >= 20 mmol/L. P-AscH(-) was infused 3 times weekly during the RT phase and 2 times weekly during the ADJ phase continuing for six cycles or until disease progression. Adverse events were quantified by CTCAE (v4.03). Results: Eleven subjects were evaluable. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Observed toxicities were consistent with historical controls. Adverse events related to study drug were dry mouth and chills. Targeted ascorbate plasma levels of 20 mmol/L were achieved in the 87.5 g cohort; diminishing returns were realized in higher dose cohorts. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.4 months and median OS was 18 months. In subjects with undetectable MGMT promoter methylation (n = 8), median PFS was 10 months and median OS was 23 months. Conclusions: P-AscH(-)/RT/TMZ is safe with promising clinical outcomes warranting further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据