4.5 Review

Co-firing of coal and biomass in oxy-fuel fluidized bed for CO2 capture: A review of recent advances

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 2261-2272

出版社

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2019.07.013

关键词

Oxy-fuel combustion; Co-firing of coal and biomass; Oxy-fuel fluidized bed; CFD simulation

资金

  1. Key Programof the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51736002]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180386]
  3. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The co-firing of coal and biomass in oxy-fuel fluidized beds is one of the most promising technologies for capturing CO2. This technology has attracted wide attention from academia and industry in recent years as a negative emission method to capture CO2 produced by carbon contained in biomass. In the past decades, many studies have been carried out regarding experiments and numerical simulations under oxy-fuel combustion conditions. This paper firstly briefly discusses the techno-economic viability of the biomass and coal co-firing with oxycombustion and then presents a review of recent advancements involving experimental research and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations in this field. Experimental studies on mechanism research, such as thermogravimetric analysis and tube furnace experiments, and fluidized bed experiments based on oxy-fuel fluidized beds with different sizes as well as the main findings, are summarized as a part of this review. It has been recognized that CFI) is a useful approach for understanding the behaviors of the co-firing of coal and biomass in oxyfuel fluidized beds. We summarize a recent survey of published CFD research on oxy-fuel fluidized bed combustion, which categorized into Eulerian and Lagrangian methods. Finally, we discuss the challenges and interests for future research. (C) 2019 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All rights All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据