4.8 Article

Full Utilization of Lignocellulose with Ionic Liquid Polyoxometalates in a One-Pot Three-Step Conversion

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 12, 期 22, 页码 4936-4945

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201902503

关键词

biomass; ionic liquids; lignin; lignocellulose; polyoxometalates

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578119]
  2. Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Department [20180414069GH]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lignin-first concept is a new innovation for full utilization of lignocellulose into value-added chemicals. Ionic liquid (IL) polyoxometalates [MIMPS](2)H4P2Mo18O62 [MIMPS=1-(3-sulfonic group) propyl-3-methyl imidazolium] are reported to be active in the cleavage of beta-O-4, alpha-O-4, and 4-O-5 bonds in three kinds of lignin models and also efficient for converting native lignocellulose. The three components in soft or hard lignocellulose were depolymerized in a one-pot three-step treatment. For soft lignocellulose (pine), lignin was first decomposed into guaiacol and phenol with yields of 15.3 and 12.9 % at 98.6 % delignification efficiency at 130 degrees C for 14 h. Meanwhile, hemicellulose and cellulose were intact during the delignifying process and were subsequently hydrolyzed to 3.5 % xylose at 100 % hemicellulose conversion efficiency at 150 degrees C for 14 h and 36.4 % glucose at 100 % cellulose conversion efficiency at 170 degrees C for 12 h, respectively. For hard lignocellulose (poplar), the yields of guaiacol and phenol were 10.1 and 8.7 % at 91.9 % delignification efficiency at 130 degrees C for 14 h, whereas 12.9 % xylose at 90.4 % hemicellulose conversion efficiency at 150 degrees C for 12 h and 32.9 % glucose at 100 % cellulose conversion efficiency at 170 degrees C for 12 h were obtained. [MIMPS](2)H4P2Mo18O62 achieved the full utilization of lignocellulose with total conversion in the lignin-first strategy and also showed the easy separation as a result of temperature-reversibility with ten recycling runs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据