4.7 Article

Hydrothermal conversion of dewatered sewage sludge: Focusing on the transformation mechanism and recovery of phosphorus

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 619-628

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.109

关键词

Dewatered sewage sludge; Hydrothermal conversion (HTC); Phosphorus; X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES); Transformation mechanism; Recovery

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0212200, 2017YFC0212900]
  2. Postgraduate Fund Project by Fudan University [IAH6281420/014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recovery of phosphorus from sewage sludge was critical due to the depletion of phosphate ore. The present research aims to identify the phosphorus speciation and reveal the phosphorus transformation mechanism of dewatered sewage sludge during hydrothermal conversion (HTC) process, as well as to achieve the high efficiency recovery of phosphorus. Multiple analysis of SMT method, VK diagram, XANES and NMR showed that most phosphorus (>80%) was transferred to the hydrochar and presented as inorganic phosphorus (IP) after the HTC process. A dehydration trend was observed of the HTC process with the increase of sub-critical temperature. Ca-associated phosphorus increased significantly as the temperature increased. The Pyro-P gradually transformed to Ortho-P with the increase of HTC temperature and disappeared at 320 degrees C. The addition of HCI (6.13 and 12.3 mmol/g) in the HTC process resulted in a high percentage (>80%) of phosphorus transferred to the aqueous phase, and the bioavailability of the residual phosphorus increased significantly. The recovery rate of phosphorus could achieve 98.37% at the pH of 7.52, with the struvite purity of 90.41%. The results of this study provide new insights into the selective transfer of phosphorus in dewatered sludge by HTC process, in addition to some efficient ways for the utilisation of the HTC products. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据