4.8 Article

Role of Structural Defects in the Adsorption and Separation of C3 Hydrocarbons in Zr-Fumarate-MOF (MOF-801)

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 20, 页码 8413-8423

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02322

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [641887]
  2. Polish National Science Centre (NCN) [2015/17/B/ST8/00099]
  3. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [CityU 21301817]
  4. PL-Grid Infrastructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective separation of propylene/propane mixtures is one of the most important processes in the petrochemical industry. Incidentally, this separation is challenging due to the extensive similarities between both gases in terms of physicochemical properties such as, but not only limited to, boiling point, kinetic diameter, and molecular weight. A drive to switch to energy efficient processes, like adsorption or membrane separation, has highlighted several microporous metal organic frameworks as promising materials. In this work, we present a combined numerical and experimental investigation on propane and propylene adsorption in Zr-fumarate-MOF (also known as MOF-801), a small pore isoreticular analogue of UiO-66. Here, we demonstrate how the presence of structural defects can completely change the sorptive properties and separation performance of the Zr-fumarate-MOF, with the loss of sieving effects and a reversal of selectivity toward propane, as well as enhanced capacity and diffusion rates for C3-sized hydrocarbons. Extensive GCMC simulations performed on mixed defective supercells show that a ratio of missing-cluster defects of around 1/8 can best account for the experimental results. Furthermore, analysis of low-frequency phonon spectra is used to explain gaseous diffusion in the original pristine material. Finally, the thermodynamic preference for propane over propylene is confirmed through column breakthrough experiments, suggesting the potential applicability of the Zr-fumarate-MOF in this challenging separation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据