4.7 Article

BiVO4 nanocrystals with controllable oxygen vacancies induced by Zn-doping coupled with graphene quantum dots for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 372, 期 -, 页码 399-407

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.161

关键词

Zn dopant; BiVO4; Oxygen vacancies; GQDs; Water splitting

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0206500, 2018YFB1502400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21533005, 21673275]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [19YF1452900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The weak electron-hole pair separation and transfer of the BiVO4 photoanode restrain its photoelectrochemical performance of water splitting. In this work, we focus on Zn doping to replace Bi-sites within BiVO4 nanocrystals to promote efficient charge separation and transfer. Theoretical and experimental results show that Zn doping induces oxygen vacancies with controllable content. Zn doping and oxygen vacancies not only shift the conduction and valance band positions of BiVO4, resulting a local built-in electric field, but also increase the carrier density, which would be beneficial for charge separation and transfer. In the meantime, water adsorption on Bisites is also activated, which would help water splitting. As a result, these contributions synergistically enhance photoelectrochemical performance with the incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of 34% at 0.6 V vs. RHE, which is much higher than that of pristine BiVO4. Furthermore, by sequentially electrodepositing graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and cobalt phosphate (Co-Pi) nano-film, we have constructed a hybrid ZnBiVO4/GQDs/Co-Pi structure to broaden the light absorption and to enhance the stability, its IPCE reaches as high as 57% and photocurrent density achieves 3.01 mA cm(-2) at 0.6 V vs. RHE, which is 8.6 times of the pristine BiVO4, thus providing an efficient strategy for the structure design of BiVO4 based photoelectrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据