4.7 Article

High-energy flexible solid-state supercapacitors based on O, N, S-tridoped carbon electrodes and a 3.5 V gel-type electrolyte

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 372, 期 -, 页码 1216-1225

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.019

关键词

O, N, S-tridoped carbon electrode; Ionic liquid gel electrolyte; Flexible solid-state supercapacitor; High energy density

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875165, 51772216, 21501135, 51838009]
  2. Science and Technology of Shanghai Municipality, China [14DZ2261100]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing advanced electrodes and electrolytes are two basic strategies to boost the energy outputs of supercapacitors, but previous studies are generally constrained to the point where only one component is focused. Herein, we report the design of high-performance O, N, S-tridoped carbon (ONSC) electrodes and a high-voltage porous gel electrolyte to construct high-energy flexible solid-state supercapacitors. First, high-surface-area (2917 m(2) g(-1)) ONSCs with enriched heteroatoms (14.85 wt%) are synthesized based on a novel and simple benzoquinone-thiourea route to achieve a superior electrochemical capacitive capability. Second, a highly porous gel polymer is utilized to support ionic liquid of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (EMIMBF4) for fabricating a 3.5 V ionogel electrolyte. The elaborated ONSC electrode and EMIMBF4 gel electrolyte enable the resultant solid-state supercapacitor with an extremely energy supply of 90.9 Wh kg(-1), along with excellent cyclability (91.6% over 10,000 cycles) and temperature robustness (0-80 degrees C). Besides, an assembled flexible solid-state device delivers an energy density of 76.6 Wh kg(-1), and manifests high flexibility with 90% retention even under a bending angle of 180 degrees. This work presents an electrode/electrolyte engineering principle to achieve highly efficient energy storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据