4.7 Article

Fabrication of amino-modified electrospun nanofibrous cellulose membrane and adsorption for typical organoarsenic contaminants: Behavior and mechanism

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 382, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122775

关键词

Adsorption; Amino-modification; Cellulose; Organoarsenic compounds; Mechanism

资金

  1. Fujian Natural Science Foundation National [2018J05017]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51908132, 21577018, 31901188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, an amino-modified electrospun nanofibrous cellulose membrane (CA-PVAm) was prepared and employed to adsorb the typical organoarsenic contaminants (roxarsone (ROX), p-arsanilic acid (p-ASA), and phenylarsonic acid (PAA)). The SEM, FT-IR, and XPS results showed that the CA-PVAm composed of abundant nanofibres and owned ample functional groups such as -NH2, -OH, and C=O groups. The batch experiments demonstrated that the CA-PVAm exhibited excellent adsorption performance on ROX (186.22 mg g(-1)), p-ASA (69.15 mg g(-1)), and PAA (62.77 mg g(-1)), which were 15.98, 6.83, and 6.25 folds larger than those of the pristine CA. In addition, the adsorption process of ROX, p-ASA, and PAA on CA-PVAm accorded with the Langmuir model and obeyed the pseudo-second-order model with intraparticle diffusion. Meanwhile, the adsorption of ROX and PAA was endothermic process, but the exothermic process was observed during the p-ASA adsorption. Furthermore, the main adsorption mechanisms involved electrostatic interactions and hydrogen-bonding interactions. The formed stable six-membered structure between -NH2 and -NO2 groups could significantly enhance the hydrogen-bonding interactions between CA-PVAm and ROX molecule, resulting in evident improvement in ROX adsorption. Importantly, the CA-PVAm displayed outstanding reusability (4 cycles) and rapid desorption rate. This study probably provides an important theoretical and experimental basis for the remediation of the emerging organic pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据