4.7 Article

The enhanced catalytic potential of sulfur-doped MgO (S-MgO) nanoparticles in activation of peroxysulfates for advanced oxidation of acetaminophen

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 371, 期 -, 页码 404-413

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.007

关键词

AOP; Catalytic activation; Peroxymonosulfate; Peroxydisulfate; Emerging contaminants; Pharmaceuticals

资金

  1. Iran National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD) [963379]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and peroxydisulfate (PDS) were activated using plain and S-doped MgO (S-MgO) for oxidation of acetaminophen (ACT) in the contaminated water. The findings indicated that S-MgO was more efficient than plain MgO in activating the oxidants and that PMS was much better activated than PDS using SMgO. The complete degradation and significant mineralization (up to 62.4%) of 50 mg/L ACT could be achieved in the S-MgO/PMS process using 1.4 mM PMS within a reaction time of 30 min and 60 min, respectively. Both SO4 center dot- and HO center dot species were simultaneously generated in the S-MgO/PMS process with the contributions of 73.8% and 26.2%, respectively, in the ACT removal attained in the process. ACT removal in the S-MgO/PMS process was not considerably affected by the solution pH between 4 and 10 and the maximum ACT removal of 93.4% was achieved at the neutral condition and optimum PMS to catalyst ratio of 0.07 mML/g. The performance of S-MgO/PMS process for removal of ACT was not affected by the presence of conventional anions in natural waters. The pathway of ACT degradation in the S-MgO/PMS process was proposed based on the Liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analysis of the effluent. Accordingly, the S-MgO is a very active catalyst to activate the PMS for simultaneous generation of SO4 center dot- and HO center dot reactive species hence S-MgO/PMS process is an emerging AOP for high rate degrading the pharmaceutical compounds present in contaminated waters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据