4.2 Article

Human Amniotic Membrane as a Matrix for Endothelial Differentiation of VEGF-Treated Dental Stem Cells

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOENGINEERING
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 599-613

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12195-019-00596-x

关键词

Angiogenic; Endothelial differentiation; Extracellular matrix; Regenerative medicine; Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth; Vascular endothelial growth factor

资金

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia [1001/PPSG/813075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Endothelial cells cover the surface of the capillary wall and literature review has cemented its angiogenic roles in wound healing and tissue regeneration. However, the angiogenic in vitro models available are inadequate to understand the endothelial differentiation process. Methods A construct was made using human amniotic membrane (HAM) as a matrix to assist the dental stem cells to differentiate into endothelial-like cells. This study aimed to assess the biological interaction between stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) and the stromal side (SS) of the glycerol-preserved HAM in angiogenic-induced environment media using VEGF. The changes were evaluated through cell morphology, migration, as well as gene expression level. Results There were morphological changes observed in SHED in angiogenic-induced media. SHED appeared to be differentiated from fibroblast-like cells to a new structure, mimicking endothelial-like structure through microscopy analysis. Besides, the cross-section of the construct revealed that the cells seeded on the matrix were able to maintain its monolayer structure at day 1, 7 and 14 but infiltrated into the HAM at day 21, suggesting cell migration. The cells were also able to maintain its stemness (Nestin, Nanog and CD29) and at the same time express the angiogenic markers (IL-8, VEGF and MMP-2). Conclusion HAM promotes SHED proliferation, migration and has the potential as a differentiating matrix for endothelial-like cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据