4.2 Article

Investigating Instructor Talk in Novel Contexts: Widespread Use, Unexpected Categories, and an Emergent Sampling Strategy

期刊

CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.18-10-0215

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1226361, 1226344]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [52007556]
  3. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  4. Division Of Undergraduate Education [1226344] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Undergraduate Education
  6. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1226361] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Instructor Talk-noncontent language used by instructors in classrooms-is a recently defined and promising variable for better understanding classroom dynamics. Having previously characterized the Instructor Talk framework within the context of a single course, we present here our results surrounding the applicability of the Instructor Talk framework to noncontent language used by instructors in novel course contexts. We analyzed Instructor Talk in eight additional biology courses in their entirety and in 61 biology courses using an emergent sampling strategy. We observed widespread use of Instructor Talk with variation in the amount and category type used. The vast majority of Instructor Talk could be characterized using the originally published Instructor Talk framework, suggesting the robustness of this framework. Additionally, a new form of Instructor Talk-Negatively Phrased Instructor Talk, language that may discourage students or distract from the learning process-was detected in these novel course contexts. Finally, the emergent sampling strategy described here may allow investigation of Instructor Talk in even larger numbers of courses across institutions and disciplines. Given its widespread use, potential influence on students in learning environments, and ability to be sampled, Instructor Talk may be a key variable to consider in future research on teaching and learning in higher education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据