4.6 Article

Truncation of MYH8 tail in AML: a novel prognostic marker with increase cell migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition utilizing RAF/MAPK pathway

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 817-827

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgz146

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea Government (MSIT) [NRF-2016R1A5A1011974, NRF-2018R1A4A1022513]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MYH8 is an actin-based motor protein involved in integrin-mediated cell adhesion and migration. Heretofore, the association of MYH8 mutation and cancer is unclear. In this study, we investigated the biologic significance of novel MYH8 tail truncation mutation, R1292X, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) which was discovered by whole-exome sequencing and targeted re-sequencing of 209 AML patients. The patients harboring the mutation all relapsed within 3.8-20.9 months. To explore the functional consequence of the mutation in AML progress, we established knock-in cell lines using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Using the established mutant model, we assessed traits of cancer progress. The mutant cells had improved motility, which was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining, wound healing, transwell migration and adhesion assay. The cell morphology and cell cycle were altered to be accessible to migration and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) transcription factors were also increased. The Raf and p44/42 MAPK pathway was a major regulator of these characteristics proved by a screening of signal transduction and inhibitor assay. Further, a public cancer genome database (cBioPortal) shows that MYH8 tail truncation mutations occurring near the R1292 position of the genome may have a significant function in cancer. In conclusion, truncation of MYH8 could be a novel prognostic marker related to poor prognosis by inducing cell migration and EMT features, and inhibition of the Raf/MAPK pathway would be a therapeutic strategy for AML patients with MYH8 tail truncation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据