4.2 Article

Lifetime reproductive success of northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris)

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 97, 期 12, 页码 1203-1217

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2019-0104

关键词

northern elephant seals; Mirounga angustirostris; lifetime reproductive success; reproductive potential; long-term animal studies; age-specific survivorship; pup production; fecundity; weaning success; cost of breeding; multiparity; supermoms

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Office of Naval Research
  3. Bureau of Land Management
  4. National Geographic Society
  5. University of California at Santa Cruz Committee on Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lifetime reproductive success of individuals in a natural population provides an estimate of Darwinian fitness. We calculated lifetime reproductive success in a colony of female northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris (Gill, 1866)) by monitoring annual breeding throughout life of 7735 female weanlings marked individually at Ano Nuevo, California, USA, from 1963 to 2005. Great variation in lifetime reproductive success was evident in three aspects of life history: (1) 75% of the females died before reaching breeding age and produced no pups; (2) nearly half of the survivors bred for only a few years before dying, and young females had low weaning success; (3) less than 1% of the females in the sample were exceptionally successful producing up to 20 pups in life. Many females that bred early, while still growing, had decreased lifespan, low weaning success, and lower lifetime reproductive success than females that postponed first breeding. Exceptional reproductive success was associated with giving birth annually, living long (up to age 23), and weaning large pups that were more likely to survive and breed. We conclude that there is strong selection for increased lifespan and multiparous supermoms that contribute significantly to pup production in the next generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据