4.4 Article

Impact of calcium, vitamin D, vitamin K, oestrogen, isoflavone and exercise on bone mineral density for osteoporosis prevention in postmenopausal women: a network meta-analysis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 84-103

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114519002290

关键词

Osteoporosis; Prevention; Bone mineral density; Postmenopausal women; Network meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71603167, 71673187, 71603166]
  2. Shanghai Key Discipline Construction Project in Public Health [15GWZK1002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this network meta-analysis is to compare bone mineral density (BMD) changes among different osteoporosis prevention interventions in postmenopausal women. We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to 24 February 2019. Included studies were randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing the effects of different treatments on BMD in postmenopausal women. Studies were independently screened by six authors in three pairs. Data were extracted independently by two authors and synthesised using Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis. The results were summarised as mean difference in BMD and surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) of different interventions. A total of ninety RCT (10 777 participants) were included. Ca, vitamin D, vitamin K, oestrogen, exercise, Ca + vitamin D, vitamin D + vitamin K and vitamin D + oestrogen were associated with significantly beneficial effects relative to no treatment or placebo for lumbar spine (LS). For femoral neck (FN), Ca, exercise and vitamin D + oestrogen were associated with significantly beneficial intervention effects relative to no treatment. Ranking probabilities indicated that oestrogen + vitamin D is the best strategy in LS, with a SUCRA of 97 center dot 29 % (mean difference: +0 center dot 072 g/cm(2) compared with no treatment, 95 % credible interval (CrI) 0 center dot 045, 0 center dot 100 g/cm(2)), and Ca + exercise is the best strategy in FN, with a SUCRA of 79 center dot 71 % (mean difference: +0 center dot 029 g/cm(2) compared with placebo, 95 % CrI -0 center dot 00093, 0 center dot 060 g/cm(2)). In conclusion, in postmenopausal women, many interventions are valuable for improving BMD in LS and FN. Different intervention combinations can affect BMD at different sites diversely.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据