4.2 Article

Impact of CT-based brachytherapy in elderly patients with cervical cancer

期刊

BRACHYTHERAPY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 771-779

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.002

关键词

Radiotherapy; Cervical cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Brachytherapy; Elderly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) has become the standard therapy for patients with cervical cancer. However, in this population, the impact of 3D-IGBT in elderly individuals remains unknown. This study assessed the efficacy of 3D-IGBT for elderly patients with cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 105 consecutive patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma aged >= 70 years who received radiotherapy alone between January 2001 and September 2014. All patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. We assessed the treatment outcomes in all patients. We then compared outcomes between two groups: patients treated by changing the Point A dose at brachytherapy (Group A, n = 71) and those treated with 3D-IGBT at least twice (Group B, n = 34). RESULTS: The median followup period was 59 (range, 6-203) months; the median age was 77 years. The 5-year local control and cause-specific survival rates were 89% and 78%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative rates of late toxicities of the rectum and bladder of Grade >= 3 were 2.0% and 4.2%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in the local control and cause-specific survival rates, or in the incidence of rectal toxicities between groups. The 3-year cumulative rates of urinary toxicity of Grade >= 1 were 20.4% and 6.9% in Group A and Group B, respectively (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with cervical cancer, 3D-IGBT could be performed safely and effectively and contributed to decreasing urinary toxicity incidence rates. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Brachytherapy Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据