4.4 Article

Versatility of reproductive modes and ploidy level interactions in Sorbus s.l. (Malinae, Rosaceae)

期刊

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 191, 期 4, 页码 502-522

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/botlinnean/boz054

关键词

apomixis; breeding system; diversification; flow cytometry; polyploidy

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [14-36079G]
  2. (Centre of Excellence PLADIAS)
  3. Grant Agency of Charles University [1584414]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the frequency of reproductive modes and the role of reproductive mode variation in diversification of the genus Sorbus s.l. and evolutionary success of individual taxa. Our sampling covers all four ploidies known in Sorbus and includes stabilized taxa and recently formed biotypes. We infer reproductive modes of 3660 seeds using the flow cytometric seed screen method; we also calculated ploidy of contributing pollen. Sorbus shows high variability in reproduction pathways (sexuality, apomixis, formation of B-III hybrids, haploid parthenogenesis). Diploids are sexual, whereas polyploids show predominantly pseudogamous apomixis. In half of the polyploids studied, several reproductive modes were present and even intra-individual variation was detected. Diploids, tetraploids and pentaploids are pollinated by conspecific pollen, whereas triploids are largely, but not fully, dependent on the pollen of other species. In pseudogamous seeds, fertilization of the central cell by both sperms is a dominant pathway of endosperm origin. Flow cytometry of pollen did not detect unreduced pollen at any ploidy. The principal mechanisms of diversification in Sorbus are residual sexuality in apomicts, production of triploid taxa from diploid-tetraploid crosses and production of B-III hybrids. Evolutionary success of Sorbus taxa is largely dependent on the breeding system and is determined by self-(in)compatibility and the interplay between stabilizing apomixis and variation-generating sexuality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据