4.8 Review

A systematic review of clinical guidelines on the management of acute, community-acquired CNS infections

期刊

BMC MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1387-5

关键词

CNS infections; Meningitis; Encephalitis; Meningoencephalitis; Guidelines; AGREE II appraisal

资金

  1. European Commission's FP7 Programme [602525]
  2. University Of North Carolina School Of Medicine International Health Fellowship Award
  3. MRC [MR/T001151/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The epidemiology of CNS infections in Europe is dynamic, requiring that clinicians have access to up-to-date clinical management guidelines (CMGs) to aid identification of emerging infections and for improving quality and a degree of standardisation in diagnostic and clinical management practices. This paper presents a systematic review of CMGs for community-acquired CNS infections in Europe. Methods A systematic review. Databases were searched from October 2004 to January 2019, supplemented by an electronic survey distributed to 115 clinicians in 33 European countries through the CLIN-Net clinical network of the COMBACTE-Net Innovative Medicines Initiative. Two reviewers screened records for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the quality using the AGREE II tool. Results Twenty-six CMGs were identified, 14 addressing bacterial, ten viral and two both bacterial and viral CNS infections. Ten CMGs were rated high quality, 12 medium and four low. Variations were identified in the definition of clinical case definitions, risk groups, recommendations for differential diagnostics and antimicrobial therapy, particularly for paediatric and elderly populations. Conclusion We identified variations in the quality and recommendations of CMGs for community-acquired CNS infections in use across Europe. A harmonised European framework-CMG with adaptation to local epidemiology and risks may improve access to up-to-date CMGs and the early identification and management of (re-)emerging CNS infections with epidemic potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据