4.8 Review

Nucleic acid diagnostics on the total integrated lab-on-a-disc for point-of-care testing

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111466

关键词

Centrifugal microfluidics; Lab-on-a-disc; Total integration; Nucleic acid; Molecular diagnostics; Point-of-care testing

资金

  1. Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI13C1232]
  2. Engineering Research Center of Excellence Program of Korea Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT)/National Research Foundation of Korea, Republic of Korea [2014R1A5A1009799]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the emergence of the lab-on-a-chip technology in 1979, a variety of microfluidic devices have been developed and utilized for chemical and biological applications. Among the microfluidic devices, the centrifugal microfluidic device or lab-on-a-disc (LOAD) has advanced remarkably due to simple operation by the rotation, total integration, and high-throughput capability. Moreover, the centrifugal microdevices do not need complex tubing and pumping systems, which render them ideal for point-of-care testing (POCT) system. Owing to these characteristics, the centrifugal microdevices have been extensively used for bio-diagnostics. In particular, molecular diagnostics, which are regarded as an essential method for definite determination of the targets related with diseases, have been widely applied on the LOAD. In this review paper, we focus on the molecular diagnostics on the LOAD. The steps for the molecular diagnostics such as cell lysis, genome purification, gene amplification, amplicon detection, and data analysis can be performed individually or totally on the LOAD. Future directions of the LOAD in the fields of bio-diagnostics is to realize POCT for U-healthcare monitoring. In this context, the latest LOAD strategies for molecular diagnostics are summarized in this review paper, which would provide an insight for future POCT platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据