4.5 Article

Metal Bridge in S4 Segment Supports Helix Transition in Shaker Channel

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 922-933

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.08.035

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM030376]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Voltage-gated ion channels play important roles in physiological processes, especially in excitable cells, in which they shape the action potential. In S4-based voltage sensors voltage-gated channels, a common feature is shared; the transmembrane segment 4 (S4) contains positively charged residues intercalated by hydrophobic residues. Although several advances have been made in understating how S4 moves through a hydrophobic plug upon voltage changes, the possible helix transition from alpha- to 3(10)-helix in S4 during the activation process is still unresolved. Here, we have mutated several hydrophobic residues from I360 to F370 in the S4 segment into histidine, in i, i + 3 and i, i + 6 or i, i + 4 and i, i + 7 pairs, to favor 3(10)- or alpha-helical conformations, respectively. We have taken advantage of the ability of His to coordinate Zn2+ to promote metal ion bridges, and we have found that the histidine introduced at position 366 (L366H) can interact with the introduced histidine at position 370 (stabilizing that portion of the S4 segment in alpha-helical conformation). In the presence of 20 mu M of Zn2+, the activation currents of L366H:F370H channels were slowed down by a factor of 3.5, and the voltage dependence is shifted by 10 mV toward depolarized potentials with no change on the deactivation time constant. Our data supports that by stabilizing a region of the S4 segment in alpha-helical conformation, a closed (resting or intermediate) state is stabilized rather than destabilizing the open (active) state. Taken together, our data indicates that S4 undergoes alpha-helical conformation to a short-lived different secondary structure transiently before reaching the active state in the activation process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据