期刊
BIOFOULING
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 796-804出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2019.1662897
关键词
Natural agents; microcosm biofilm; dental caries; enamel; mouthwash; toothpaste
资金
- CAPES [FAPESP 2017/00556-0, 2017/23013-1, 2017/23165-6, 2017/17249-2]
- Fundacao de Amparo do Estado de Sao Paulo [FAPESP 2017/00556-0, 2017/23013-1, 2017/23165-6, 2017/17249-2]
This work evaluated the effects of commercial toothpastes and mouth rinses containing natural/herbal agents on biofilm viability, extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) production and on enamel demineralization in vitro. Microcosm biofilm was produced on bovine enamel for 5 days and treated daily with: Organico natural (R) (toothpaste/mouth rinse), Boni Natural Menta & Malaleuca (R) (toothpaste/mouth rinse), Propolis & Myrrh (R) (toothpaste), Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint (R) (toothpaste, positive control), Malvatricin (R) Plus (mouth rinse), PerioGard (R) (mouth rinse, positive control) or PBS (negative control). Tom's Propolis & Myrrh (R) and Colgate Total 12 (R) toothpastes and Malvatricin (R) Plus and PerioGard (R) mouth rinses significantly reduced biofilm viability (p < 0.05). Only PerioGard (R) had significant effects on biofilm thickness and EPS. Despite the indication that Tom's Propolis & Myrrh (R) significantly reduced lesion depth, only Colgate Total 12 (R) significantly reduced mineral loss. Malvatricin (R) Plus significantly reduced mineral loss and lesion depth, as did PerioGard (R). Some herbal products, Malvatricin (R) Plus and Tom's Propolis & Myrrh (R), showed anticaries effects.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据