4.7 Article

Multi-criterion mammographic risk analysis supported with multi-label fuzzy-rough feature selection

期刊

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101722

关键词

Learning classifiers; Feature selection; Multiple criteria; Multiple labels; Fuzzy-rough dependency; Mammographic risk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61502068]
  2. Royal Society International Exchanges Cost Share Award
  3. NSFC [1E160875]
  4. Innovation Support Plan for Dalian High-level Talents [2018RQ70]
  5. Ser Cymru II COFUND Fellowship, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context and background: Breast cancer is one of the most common diseases threatening the human lives globally, requiring effective and early risk analysis for which learning classifiers supported with automated feature selection offer a potential robust solution. Motivation: Computer aided risk analysis of breast cancer typically works with a set of extracted mammographic features which may contain significant redundancy and noise, thereby requiring technical developments to improve runtime performance in both computational efficiency and classification accuracy. Hypothesis: Use of advanced feature selection methods based on multiple diagnosis criteria may lead to improved results for mammographic risk analysis. Methods: An approach for multi-criterion based mammographic risk analysis is proposed, by adapting the recently developed multi-label fuzzy-rough feature selection mechanism. Results: A system for multi-criterion mammographic risk analysis is implemented with the aid of multi-label fuzzy-rough feature selection and its performance is positively verified experimentally, in comparison with representative popular mechanisms. Conclusions: The novel approach for mammographic risk analysis based on multiple criteria helps improve classification accuracy using selected informative features, without suffering from the redundancy caused by such complex criteria, with the implemented system demonstrating practical efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据