4.5 Review

Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes With Respect to Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Minimal Clinically Important Difference

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. ASIAM
  2. Vail Health Services
  3. Vail Valley Surgery Center Governing Council
  4. International Society for Hip Arthroscopy
  5. AOSSM
  6. Steadman Philippon Research Institute
  7. Smith Nephew
  8. MIS
  9. CONMED Linvatec
  10. Bledsoe
  11. Donjoy
  12. Arthrosurface
  13. SLACK Incorporated
  14. Elsevier
  15. Hipco
  16. Ossur
  17. Siemens
  18. Arthrex
  19. A-3 Surgical
  20. American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
  21. Arthroscopy Association of North America
  22. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  23. Stryker
  24. Springer
  25. Allosource
  26. Athletico
  27. DJ Orthopaedics
  28. Linvatec
  29. Miomed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine whether the hip arthroscopy literature to date has shown outcomes consistent with published patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) estimates. Methods: All clinical investigations of hip arthroscopy using modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and/or Hip Outcome Score (HOS) outcomes with at least 1 year of follow-up were reviewed. Ninety-one studies (9,746 hips) were included for review. Eighty-one studies (9,317 hips) contained only primary hip arthroscopies and were the primary focus of this review. The remaining studies (429 hips) did not exclude patients with prior surgical history and were thus considered separately. Mean mHHS, HOS-ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and HOS-SS (Sports-Specific) scores were compared with previously published PASS and MCID values. Results: After 31 +/- 20 months, 5.8% of study populations required revision arthroscopy and 5.5% total hip arthroplasty. A total of 88%, 25%, and 30% of study populations met PASS for mHHS, HOS-ADL, and HOS-SS, respectively, and 97%, 90%, and 93% met MCID. On bivariate analysis, increasing age was associated with significantly worse postoperative mHHS (P < .01, R-2 = 0.14), HOS-SS (P < .05, R-2 = 0.12), and rates of reoperation (P = .02, R-2 = 0.08). Increasing body mass index was associated with significantly worse HOS-ADL (P = .02, R-2 - 0.35) and HOS-SS (P - .03, R-2 - 0.30). Conclusions: In this meta-analysis of 81 studies of primary hip arthroscopy, we have found that more than 90% of study populations meet MCID standards for the most commonly used patientreported outcomes measures in hip arthroscopy literature, mHHS and HOS. Eighty-eight percent meet PASS standards for the mHHS, but PASS standards are far more difficult to achieve for HOS-ADL (25%) and HOS-SS (30%) subscales. Differences in psychometric properties of the mHHS and HOS likely account for the discrepancies in PASS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据