4.6 Article

Synergistic effect of buthionine sulfoximine on the chlorin e6-based photodynamic treatment of cancer cells

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 990-999

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12272-019-01179-0

关键词

l-buthionine sulfoximine; Photodynamic therapy; Chlorin e6; Synergistic anticancer effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigated the synergistic effect of l-buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) on the chlorin e6 (Ce6)-based photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer cells. Among various cancer cells, HCT116 cells have highest intracellular L-glutathione (GSH) level and SNU478 cells showed the lowest GSH level. BSO alone showed negligible intrinsic cytotoxicity against CCD986sk cells. Since HCT116 and SNU478 cells showed the highest and the lowest intracellular GSH levels, respectively, those were used to test synergistic effect on the Ce6-based PDT. In the absence of light, BSO and Ce6 combination did not practically increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) in either of HCT116 or SNU478 cells, while light irradiation increased ROS level dose-dependently. 10 mu M BSO treatment significantly depleted total GSH level in cancer cells, i.e. total GSH level decreased to one-fourth of the control in HCT116 cells while it decreased to two-fifth of the control treatment at SNU478 cell. BSO showed synergistic effect on the ROS production in HCT116 cells while it has practically no benefits in ROS production of SNU478 cells. No synergistic effect was observed in viability of SNU478 cells because BSO itself was cytotoxic to SNU478 cells. However, BSO had negligible cytotoxicity against HCT116 cells and showed synergistic anticancer effect in combination with Ce6-based PDT. Furthermore, the addition of glutathione reduced ethyl ester (GSH-OEt), recovered intracellular GSH level, and cell viability with reduced the intracellular ROS level. We suggest that synergistic effect of BSO in the Ce6-based PDT should be considered with intrinsic intracellular GSH level of cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据