4.7 Article

Augmentation of a pyramid solar still performance using evacuated tubes and nanofluid: Experimental approach

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113997

关键词

Solar energy; Desalination; Pyramid solar still; Evacuated tube; Nanofluids; Copper oxide; Carbon black

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576076, 51711540031]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2017CFA046]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019kfyRCP045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an experimental approach of a new hybrid system of modified pyramid solar still combined with evacuated tubes and nanofluids for high thermal performance. The current work compares between the performance and costs of three different units; one reference conventional solar still (CSS) and a couple of pyramid solar stills namely: conventional pyramid solar still (CPSS) and modified pyramid solar still (MPSS). The MPSS was integrated with evacuated tubes and, furtherly, nanofluids which are copper oxide (CuO) and carbon black (CB) nanomaterials with 1.5% wt. According to resulted data, the enhancement percentage in total freshwater was 4.77 and 26.6% in the case of MPSS over CPSS and CSS, respectively. Furthermore, the total freshwater was improved by about 27.85 and 54.48% in case of MPSS with copper oxide over CPSS and CSS. Finally, the enhancement percentage in total freshwater was 33.59 and 57.098% in case of MPSS with carbon black over CPSS and CSS, respectively. Moreover, the daily efficiency (eta(d)) of MPSS reached 50% whereas it reached 61% and 64.5% in the case of MPSS with copper oxide and carbon black, respectively. On the other hand, eta(d) reached 48 and 30% for CPSS and CSS, respectively. Finally, the performed cost analysis shows that the proposed MPSS with nanofluids has economically reasonable with the offered optimal thermal performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据