4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparative electrochemical analysis of rGO-FeVO4 nanocomposite and FeVO4 for supercapacitor application

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 488, 期 -, 页码 221-227

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.259

关键词

Graphene oxide; Supercapacitors; DFT; Electrochemistry

资金

  1. major research project of University Grants Commission [43-407/2014 (SR)]
  2. UGC-DAE CSR, Indore [CSR/CRS87/201415/594]
  3. UGC-DAE CSR, Mumbai center [UDCSR/MUM/CD/CRSM-263/2017/1036]
  4. UGC
  5. DST, Government of India, New Delhi through UGC SAP DRS-I program
  6. DST, Government of India, New Delhi through FIST Level-I program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel FeVO4 and rGO-FeVO4 nanocomposite are synthesized by co-precipitation method and sonochemical method post co-precipitation and modified Hummer's method. The structural and morphological studies were carried out by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) measurements. XRD studies confirm that FeVO4 is in single phase having triclinic crystal structure with space group P-1(2). Raman spectra of FeVO4, GO, and rGO-FeVO4 nanocomposite show characteristic peaks of FeVO4, GO and both FeVO4 & GO signatures together, respectively. Electrochemical characterization of the samples is done by using Cyclic Voltammetric (CV), Galvanometric Charging Discharging (GCD) and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopic (EIS) analysis methods. Cyclic voltammogram of rGO-FeVO4 nanocomposite manifests the pseudo-capacitor nature. The specific capacitance of rGO-FeVO4 nanocomposite is found to be 189.10 F/g @ 0.5 mA/cm(2) while of FeVO4 was 97.54F/g @ 0.5 mA/cm(2). A two-fold increase in specific capacitance is found for rGO-FeVO4 composite as compared to FeVO4. Extensive DFT simulations were carried out to study the structural and electronic properties of FeVO4 and rGO-FeVO4 hybrid structure and to bring theoretical insight for the enhanced specific capacitance in the hybrid structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据