4.7 Article

Tribological performance of metal-reinforced ceramic composites selectively structured with femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 499, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143917

关键词

Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS); Selective surface structuring; Ceramic matrix composites; Tribology; Coefficient of friction; Wettability

资金

  1. German Research Council (DFG)
  2. DFG [INST 275/257-1 FUGG]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of femtosecond (fs) laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) on tribological properties was investigated for metal-reinforced ceramic composites (Al2O3-ZrO2-Nb). For this purpose, the metallic niobium (Nb) phase was selectively structured with LIPSS in an air environment with different values of the fs-laser peak fluence by near-infrared fs-laser radiation (lambda = 1025 nm, tau = 300 fs, f(rep) = 1 kHz), taking advantage of the different light absorption behavior of ceramic and metal. The tribological performance was evaluated by reciprocating sliding tests in a ball-on-disc configuration using Ringer's solution as lubricant. The surfaces were characterized before and after laser irradiation by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and by measuring the contact angle with Ringer's solution. The LIPSS formation resulted in an increased wetting of the surface with the lubricant. Moreover, the selectively structured composite surfaces revealed a coefficient of friction significantly reduced by a factor of similar to 3 when compared to the non-irradiated surface. Furthermore, the formation of a laserinduced oxidation layer was detected with NbO as the most prominent oxidation state. Selectively structured composites with outstanding mechanical properties and enhanced tribological performance are of particular interest for biomedical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据