4.4 Article

Two-dimensional temperature field imaging in laminar sooting flames using a two-line Kr PLIF approach

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS B-LASERS AND OPTICS
卷 125, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-019-7280-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF CBET grant [1511216]
  2. ARO [W911NF-16-1-0087]
  3. North Carolina State University Graduate Fellowship Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A two-line Kr PLIF approach is presented for thermometry in moderately sooting flames. This technique leverages the spectral line-broadening phenomenon to choose the two excitation wavelengths whose Kr PLIF signal ratio effectively cancels out the composition dependence while retaining the temperature dependence. Furthermore, the Kr PLIF ratio for the chosen wavelengths also exhibits a monotonic trend with temperature, and span a wide range of values to ensure adequate dynamic range on the measurements. The technique is evaluated in the near field of an ethylene laminar jet flame where the peak soot loading was about Krypton gas was added in small amounts to both fuel mixture and air co-flow. Comparing the Kr PLIF fields with the LII fields showed that the main source of interference to Kr PLIF signal is from the soot interference, which contributed to a maximum of 20- of the total signal at different axial locations. Interestingly, the interference from PAH molecules was observed to be less than of the total signal. The soot interference was retained during data processing to obtain an evaluation of the measurement uncertainty caused by the soot interference and the maximum soot loading that could be tolerated. The temperature in the regions away from soot layers exhibit very consistent values with literature, where the value extended from close to This limit is observed to be a strong function of the fractional contribution of the soot interference to the overall signal and can be substantially extended by subtracting the soot interference and using higher excitation energies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据