4.5 Article

Extraction of soils above concealed lithium deposits for rare metal exploration in Jiajika area: A pilot study

期刊

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 142-151

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.05.018

关键词

Extraction; Soil; Concealed lithium deposit; Jiajika

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0602700]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, China
  3. Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource, Ministry of Education, Southwest University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Jiajika in Sichuan, China, is an important mining area for lithium and other Group I and Group II elements. However, the weathered residual overburden makes it difficult to prospect using traditional soil geochemistry. Deep-penetrating geochemical theories provide new ideas and methods that can be used to explore for concealed ore bodies. In this study, topsoil samples were collected from 10 to 25 cm depth above two concealed lithium deposits, Vein 804 (V-804) and Vein X03 (V-X03). Lithium (Li), cesium (Cs), rubidium (Rb), beryllium (Be), and boron (B) were extracted from the soils using pure water and 0.2 mol/L potassium sulfate solutions (K2SO4). Anomalies were observed for water-extractable Li, Cs, and Rb, and K2SO4-extractable Li, Cs, and Be in samples from above both veins. The harmonic mean of the data for each element was used to calculate the response ratio. The highest response ratios are 1.2-2.5 times and 2 to 8 times higher than the response ratios for other samples from V-804 and V-X03, respectively. Linear correlations are observed between the water-extractable and K2SO4 extractable elements, and imply that unbound species of the elements were extracted by K2SO4. The extracted elements display single peak, double peak, and multi-peak anomaly patterns, which indicate that transfer of Li, Cs, Rb, Be, and B through the overburden may be through a combination of diffusion, capillarity, electrochemical forces, and redox gradients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据