4.8 Review

A review on hydrothermal co-liquefaction of biomass

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 926-945

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.033

关键词

Hydrothermal co-liquefaction; Biomass; Bio-crude oil; Model compounds; Kinetics and statistical modeling

资金

  1. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery, Canada [RGPIN 04211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrothermal co-liquefaction of biomass has attracted considerable research interest as it has potential to reduce logistics costs, increase biocrude yield and improve biocrude quality. This work summarizes hydrothermal co-liquefaction of various biomass, in which co-liquefaction effect (either synergistic, antagonistic or additive) on biocrude yield of was examined. Observed synergetic effects must be critically assessed due to inconsistent reaction/separation conditions, uncertain statistical significance of experimental data and varied indicator of co-liquefaction effect in the studies reported. The chemical interactions among biomass model components (cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, lipid, and protein) were also thoroughly investigated to explore the origin of co-liquefaction effect. Recent progresses on modeling hydrothermal liquefaction was reviewed as well, including quantitative models for predicting product yield as a function of the biochemical composition of biomass feedstock and/or reaction parameters, and kinetics models of reaction network among individual component of biomass. These models are useful tools to investigate co-liquefaction effect, optimize feedstock mixing for co-liquefaction, and ultimately facilitate more efficient biomass conversion. The major challenges in the study of co-liquefaction are identified such as statistical significance of co-liquefaction effect, evaluation of co-liquefaction effect under identical liquefaction and separation conditions, and understanding of co-liquefaction effect at a molecular level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据