4.8 Article

Modeling and field-test of a compact electromagnetic energy harvester for railroad transportation

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 247, 期 -, 页码 309-321

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.051

关键词

Railway energy harvesting; Mechanical motion rectifier; Ball screw; Railway track dynamics

资金

  1. Commonwealth Research Commercialization Fund
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51728503]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Traction Power at Southwest Jiao Tong University Open Grant [TPL 1808]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enable the smart technologies and safe operation of transit and rail transportation, such as hot box detector, track health monitoring and wireless communication on the railroad side, a cost-effective energy source is in need. This paper presents the design, modeling, in-lab experiment and field-test results of a compact ball-screw based electromagnetic energy harvester with a mechanical motion rectifier (MMR) mechanism for smart railway transportation. The MMR mechanism is realized by the embedded one-way clutches in the bevel gears, which converts the bi-directional track vibration into the unidirectional rotation of the generator. Compared to previous designs, the proposed harvester has reduced backlash and thus can harvest energy from a small input of the track deflection induced by the moving train. Two prototypes with different key design parameters were built and tested. A comprehensive model considering the train-rail-harvester interaction was developed to analyze the dynamic characteristics of the coupled system and predict the energy harvesting performance of the harvesters at different train speeds. Both in-lab and field tests were carried out to examine the energy harvesting performance of the harvesters and validate the model. Field test results illustrated that an average power of 1.12 W and 2.24 W were achieved for two prototypes respectively when a Type A rapid transit passed by with a 30 km/h vehicle speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据