4.7 Article

Parkin Regulates Programmed Necrosis and Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Targeting Cyclophilin-D

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 31, 期 16, 页码 1177-1193

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2019.7734

关键词

Parkin; CypD; mPTP; programmed necrosis; myocardial ischemia; reperfusion injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Cardiomyocyte death critically contributes to the pathogenesis of cardiac disorders, such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiac ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. As one of the main forms of cardiac cell death, necrosis plays a critical role in heart diseases. Multiple signaling pathways of necrosis have been demonstrated, in which death receptors, receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein 1 and 3 kinases, and cyclophilin-D (CypD) have been deeply implicated. However, the fundamental mechanism underlying myocardial necroptosis, especially the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP)-CypD-dependent death pathway, is poorly understood. Parkin functions as an E3 ubiquitin protein ligase that mainly mediates mitophagy cascades. As yet, it is not clear whether Parkin participates in regulating necrosis and myocardial I/R injury. Results: Here, our results showed that Parkin mediated mitophagy and inhibited necrosis under oxidative stress. In further exploring the underlying mechanisms, we found that Parkin suppressed mPTP opening by catalyzing the ubiquitination of CypD in necrotic cascades, which were not involved in Parkin-regulated mitophagy. Parkin inhibited necrosis, reduced myocardial I/R injury, and improved cardiac function. Innovation: Our present work reveals a highlighted connection between the mitochondrial matrix-localized Parkin and the mPTP-CypD-dependent necrotic signaling pathway in cardiac injury. Conclusion: Our results revealed a novel myocardial necrotic regulating model composed of Parkin, CypD, and mPTP, which may provide potential therapeutic targets and strategies to modulate the levels of these molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据