4.8 Article

Dual-Priming Isothermal Amplification (DAMP) for Highly Sensitive and Specific Molecular Detection with Ultralow Nonspecific Signals

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 20, 页码 12852-12858

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02582

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01EB023607, R01CA214072, R21TW010625]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleic acid amplification tests have been widely used in clinical diagnostics, food safety monitoring, and molecular biology. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a prevailing nucleic acid isothermal amplification method. It has become a powerful alternative to conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for pathogen detection because of its simplicity, rapidity, and high sensitivity. However, the current LAMP methods, especially LAMP with two loop primers, suffer from undesired nonspecific amplification with strong background signals due to the increasing target sites. This nonspecific amplification substantially reduced the reliability of LAMP and limited its applications in clinical diagnostics. Here, we report a dual-priming (self-priming and pairing-priming) isothermal amplification (DAMP) assay for rapid nucleic acid detection with ultralow nonspecific signals. This method takes advantage of the dual-priming strand extension strategy by adding two pairing-competition primers and designing unique inner primers, enabling highly sensitive and specific molecular detection. As an application demonstration, the DAMP assay was used to detect HIV-1 DNA/RNA and Escherichia coli DNA, showing equal or better sensitivity with shorter detection time compared to conventional LAMP and PCR methods. More importantly, the DAMP assay showed ultralow background signals without false positive signals even after a 2 h incubation. Such a simple, reliable, sensitive, and specific DAMP assay can be well suited for rapid nucleic acid detection as point-of-care testing, particularly in resource-limited settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据